Millett Sights has been making external sights for many years, and a while back they also joined the scope making business. One of their newer offerings is a dedicated tactical scope that is based on their Buck Gold series of scopes. The Tactical Rifle Scope 1 (TRS-1) is a 4-16x50mm scope with side focus and some other typical tactical scope features. Millett has also recently announced they have a new model that is a fixed 10x. There had been several questions posted about the scope and its quality on the forums and via direct emails, so we figured it wouldn’t hurt to evaluate one. We ordered a TRS-1 and prepared for the review.

milletttrs1

One of the first things you will notice is that the scopes are fairly hard to find in stock. They have been hot sellers and Millett has recently ramped up production to help with the supply of these scopes. The actual model of the scope is the Buck Gold Side Focus Tactical Rifle Scope… but more commonly known as the TRS-1. It arrived in a nice box with a cloth scope bag (or sock?), small Allen wrench (for the turrets), lens cloth, lens covers, some minor paperwork, and a 3″ sun shade. Part of the paperwork was a small mil reference sheet that was a bit confusing to understand. But once you figure it out, it shows the number of inches 1, 1.5, 2.0 … 5.0 mils will cover at anywhere from 100 – 500 yards in 50 yard increments.

The scope tube is a single piece aluminum tube of 30mm diameter. It has a nice even matte anodized finish, though I noticed the sunshade matte color was slightly different than the main scope body. No big deal. The size of the scope is more of the larger design that has become popular in recent years for tactical scopes, and it does feel robust and durable. The power ring is larger than the eyepiece and has a nice knurled area in which to grab and adjust. The power ring adjustment is smooth all the way around, but there is an actual audible and tactile ‘click’ right at the 10x mark. It sounds and feels intentional, but I don’t know why since the mildot reticule on this scope is accurate at 16x. It would be a very nice feature if that was where the mil-dots were accurate at, but I really cannot explain why it is there on this scope.

milletttrs3

The turrets are of a good size and shape, similar to Leupold M1 knobs and are 1/8 MOA per click. The 1/8 is certainly accurate and allows for very precise adjustments, but on a tactical scope where many scope changes are used, I prefer 1/4 MOA clicks to help prevent having to dial twice as many clicks for adjustments. But that being said, the 1/8th clicks are precise and these knobs are nice. There is 9 MOA per revolution and while the spec sheet says there are 65 MOA of adjustment, this one actually had 109 MOA of vertical adjustments. I have heard 100 MOA from millett directly, and that is what I would plan on having if you were purchasing one of these scopes. The windage knob is marked starting at 1 going each direction, which is a feature I really like on tactical scopes. But, on this particular scope with the 1/8 MOA clicks and only 9 MOA per revolution, at 4.5 MOA you now are overlapping on the numbers. So if you were at 6 MOA right, the knob would read 3. It is not a horrible deal, but some confusion can happen, and it is the same argument for all scopes with knobs marked like this, but on this scope, it happens at only 5 MOA. The other thing I did not like about the knobs is that there is no visual reference for how many times the elevation knob has rotated around zero. Most other makers with external knobs provide horizontal lines on the elevation knob that can be used as a reference for how many times the knob has rotated past zero.

The other interesting feature with the knobs on this scope is the lock rings on both the elevation and windage knobs. The lock ring is knurled also and is located at the bottom of each knob. A slight turn clockwise locks each knob so they will not move. They work as designed and are easy to operate, and there are times where an inadvertent knob turning does happen in the field. I’m not sure how important the feature really is, but it does work and is something other makers do not offer.

Side focus knobs are a popular trend of tactical scopes, as they should be, allowing for precise adjusting of the objective within easy reach while behind the scope. The TRS-1 has a large diameter knob that is marked from 10yds to infinity. The focus works as it should, but there was a problem with how stiff the knob is to adjust. I do not know if it was just this particular scope, or if all of them are like this, but the focus knob is very stiff and hard to adjust. Once applying enough force to twist it, it is smooth, but still requires significant force to keep moving it. I thought it may loosen up, but it has not yet. It is not a two finger twist, but requires ham fisting it. It works and focuses as it should, it is just very stiff to twist.

milletttrs2

The reticule is a unique mildot design that is intuitive. Originally we thought there are half mil tick marks to aid in accurate mil readings, but it turns out according to later documentation that each mark, regardless of hash or dot, is a full MIL. We found this to be odd and at times confusing as the mind naturally assumes the different shapes mean different things. Of course, with use this will be become more natural, but it is still a bit odd. The dots are very small compared to normal mildot reticules. The USMC mildot is .25 mils, and the US Army mil-dot is .22 (or .2 if you round like the US Army teaches) but these dots are even smaller. The mil sheet provided says they are 1/4 MOA dots, which translates to about .07 mils, or 1/3 the size of a US Army mildot. They don’t look quite that small, but I may be mistaken, or perhaps the documentation is incorrect, but they are small. Small dots are fine, just different, and they do not obscure much of the target. The reticule is nicely etched onto the glass for durability. The reticule is on the second focal plane which means it stays the same size no matter what magnification you are on, so for the mildots to be accurate, you have to be on the designated magnification, which for this scope is 16x. The reticule is lighted green with 10 different power settings. I did notice if it was fairly dark like at late dusk and the reticule setting was on the higher settings (above about 8) there was some excess light entering the tube from the lighting component from both the 7 o’clock and 2 o’clock position in the scope. You only really see it if there is not much light out, but it does indicate perhaps the quality of the eye piece housing containing the lighted reticule could use some improvement.

milletttrs4

One of the most difficult parts of evaluating scopes is trying to measure optical quality. There is no easy test that I have found that a person can use to measure or compare optical quality. This is especially true with modern scopes where optical quality on even the low end scopes is superior to what was considered good optics about 30 years ago. That being said, the optical quality on this scope, at least with me looking through it, appears to be pretty good. It was clearly better than a low end Barska, but not quite as nice as a Leupold VX2. I would state that the optics are probably about as good as a SWFA SS, or in the Burris Fullfield 2 range, an okay middle grade optic.

With the scope mounted on our .308 tactical test mule rifle, the scope performed well shooting through the box accurately and ending where we started. The stiff focus knob continued to be a bit of a hassle while shooting at different ranges, but the target knobs were easy to use, though we did not find ourselves using the locks too often (if at all?). Though we didn’t spend much time doing simulated operations, so perhaps those locks would be handier in those cases. Having to dial in all of those 1/8 MOA clicks was also a bit tedious when going between all the different ranges, and you had to be careful to keep track of where you were on the knobs. But in terms of field performance, the scope did just fine and is certainly a usable scope for tactical operations.

The scope is another decent option in the lower-middle grade scopes, but I would like to see a bit better quality control in terms of the very stiff focus knob and the leaking light from the lit reticule. The locking knobs are an interesting distinguishing feature that might be important to some, and there are plenty of elevation adjustments for long range use. For a lower end rifle or someone just getting into long range shooting, this scope is at least worth considering.

Sniper Central – 2007

 

12 Comments

hatsan125sniper

Here is the instructions http://www.millettsights.com/downloads/TRS_Manual_WEB.pdf If you scroll down to page 5 and 6 you can see you should set it to 10 power for mil dot measuring. not 16. And each click is .1 mil. . And that each mark be it dot or dash is a full mil. You said ( There are half mil tick marks to aid in accurate mil readings, and there are dots at the whole mil marks) This is not right . The dash is a full mil and so is the dot . look at the picture on page 6 at the top it clearly shows you that dot to dash is a full mil. Please let me know If I am wrong.

Reply
Mel Ewing

Again, this was a very early version where it was 16x, it was changed after that to be 10x (like the knobs went from 1/8 to 1/4 clicks). The documentation does indicate that each hash, as well as dot is 1 full MIL, which I can correct in the review… though I see no logical reason why they would do that, it just confuses the shooter.

Reply
hatsan125sniper

The turret dial on the scope is in inches ,1 click equals .75 inches. so each click is the same as 0.2 mils. because 0.1 mil = 0.36 inches ,so 0.36×2 = .72 inches . You should have ordered the .1mil click scope BK81008 . Keeping the turret in mil adjustments makes thing a lot easier to use . You should never mix a mil-dot system with a moa dial or in inches. This dial is setup for a 308 Win with a 168 gr to make thing simple for users of the bullet .

Reply
Mel Ewing

Actually, that is not correct, this was an original TRS-1 which had the 1/8″ clicks (look at the picture of the knobs), and even the new model uses .25″ clicks (not .2 mils). Even then, mixing MOA knobs with MIL reticle is perfectly acceptable and is what is on the M24’s and many other duty sniper rifles in use today. It is just a matter of training, not a matter of non-functionality. I use MIL/MIL, MIL/MOA, MOA/MOA scopes all the time and each is as accurate and usable as the other, just a matter of learning what you have and loving it.

Reply
Mel Ewing

We no longer have the scope, but over time the components began to wear out and a bit more slop was evident. The lower quality of the Chinese made scopes really becomes apparent over time.

Reply
Mark Reynolds

I have a number of these scopes and have yet to have any wear apparent with them. And if they do wear to the point where it is an issue, it is life time warranty. These are made in Taiwan. Not China.

Reply
Mel Ewing

If yours are still working well, then by all means keep using them! We have not had the same luck and all of our records indicate the Millett scopes are made in China. Perhaps that has changed as this sample was from a number of years ago. (2007)

Reply
Panamaszr12

I recently purchased s 6-25×56 lrs and have had nothing but problems. See I bought the higher magnification for my fiancĂ© and long distance competition. I’d hoped that the better scope would help her recent diagnosis of 20/200 visual impairment but the glass was fuzzy, and the scope would loose tracking. We’ve sent it back but now in the middle of the season are told it will take a month to look at the scope. I’ve written to the CEO of vista outdoors, bushnell and sent an attached letter with the scope. I can tell you all the waisted ammo and now inconvenience has cost far more than the scope is worth. I will see if anyone at bushnell or vista outdoors will take care of us and let you know our outcome.

Reply
Mel Ewing

Thanks for sharing your experience. Hopefully it is resolved to your satisfaction.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>